So, here it is. A dogmatic, intolerant liberal work against the introduction of Intelligent Design Theory in public schools. It is with characteristic self-righteousness, our liberal's 'voice of the day' expounds liberal stylings in writing.
Well, I am here to point out some of the guile and short assumptions of the piece. Let's get it!
"Ben Stein, the comedian advertising buffoon."~ Guess what buttercup? BenStein is much, much more than a buffoon. But the liberal writer expects no research. He banks on the reader taking the statement as gospel. Mr Stein has been involved in more facets of American life than can be reconciled here. Our writer minimizes greater thinking by name calling..a sure sign of high thinking.
"intelligent design," the belief that one God created the world and life, is absurd!"~Yep. There's no absurdity involved in using Joni Mitchell's lyrics to validate scientific debate of Evolution over Intelligent Design. Now, that's some stellar thinking! Somehow, pop icon lyricism overshadows years of debate still raging in the scientific community. The liberal mind is closed to thought outside the doctrine.
"everyone is entitled to their own belief ..., as long as they do not infringe on my beliefs" ~Oh no. Not infringement!! Oh dear sensitive reader, do not tread on these fine sensibilities. Do you get this? Contrary beliefs represent a challenge to personal rights. This, above all, is the hallmark of close-minded thinking.
"or try to defy the public school system's purpose of teaching students the truth"~I defy the public schools to teach anything other than humanist doctrine or correctly teach Math & Science, for that matter. Maybe it's time to shake up our state schools Science departments?
"He may be intelligent enough to follow the facts, or he may be so conflicted because of his strict religious family's beliefs."~Religion = bad. Facts based in "collective thought" = good. You see the family doesn't matter. It's confining and restrictive. Collectivism is freedom. Ask anyone who lived in Communist Poland. Diversification of teachings and free choice represent the the greatest threat to the liberal mindset.
"Our forefathers meant for us to have a separation of church and state"~Yes, yes. The great tenant (re: myth) of any good liberal argument against free religious discourse in the public forum. Frankly, I am surprised it took the writer this long to pull it out. At best, it's boring. So, I'll give you some great reading to counter this insipid, lock step argumentation. I'll even point out the banality of separation. The Constitutional implication isn't a difficult conclusion. It is meant to prevent using religion (ex: Church of England) as a preferential, state organization. The conclusion wasn't to prevent freedom from religion in the national conversation or life.
Well, I am here to point out some of the guile and short assumptions of the piece. Let's get it!
"Ben Stein, the comedian advertising buffoon."~ Guess what buttercup? BenStein is much, much more than a buffoon. But the liberal writer expects no research. He banks on the reader taking the statement as gospel. Mr Stein has been involved in more facets of American life than can be reconciled here. Our writer minimizes greater thinking by name calling..a sure sign of high thinking.
"intelligent design," the belief that one God created the world and life, is absurd!"~Yep. There's no absurdity involved in using Joni Mitchell's lyrics to validate scientific debate of Evolution over Intelligent Design. Now, that's some stellar thinking! Somehow, pop icon lyricism overshadows years of debate still raging in the scientific community. The liberal mind is closed to thought outside the doctrine.
"everyone is entitled to their own belief ..., as long as they do not infringe on my beliefs" ~Oh no. Not infringement!! Oh dear sensitive reader, do not tread on these fine sensibilities. Do you get this? Contrary beliefs represent a challenge to personal rights. This, above all, is the hallmark of close-minded thinking.
"or try to defy the public school system's purpose of teaching students the truth"~I defy the public schools to teach anything other than humanist doctrine or correctly teach Math & Science, for that matter. Maybe it's time to shake up our state schools Science departments?
"He may be intelligent enough to follow the facts, or he may be so conflicted because of his strict religious family's beliefs."~Religion = bad. Facts based in "collective thought" = good. You see the family doesn't matter. It's confining and restrictive. Collectivism is freedom. Ask anyone who lived in Communist Poland. Diversification of teachings and free choice represent the the greatest threat to the liberal mindset.
"Our forefathers meant for us to have a separation of church and state"~Yes, yes. The great tenant (re: myth) of any good liberal argument against free religious discourse in the public forum. Frankly, I am surprised it took the writer this long to pull it out. At best, it's boring. So, I'll give you some great reading to counter this insipid, lock step argumentation. I'll even point out the banality of separation. The Constitutional implication isn't a difficult conclusion. It is meant to prevent using religion (ex: Church of England) as a preferential, state organization. The conclusion wasn't to prevent freedom from religion in the national conversation or life.
"Yaaaay! At least one candidate for governor is an evolved human being."~Yaaay! Name calling is easy!!
"Rep. Wayne Cooper, Republican ... And what kind of people voted this joker a job at the state legislature? "~ I suppose a majority. Oh? That was a slight. I couldn't tell by the name calling....witty.
"I never cease to be surprised how little we all have evolved when the intelligence of man is involved!"~A rapacious statement that plumbs the depth of the depressive mindset. It places the core on display, but speaks a great truth, too. Faith in man vs. God will fail you.
No comments:
Post a Comment