First, this article was written by my Pops.
Props!!! He's a good writer who needs some better recognition.
http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080331/OPINIONS02/803310331/1006/OPINIONS Who cares if he muddles astute writing with Biblical insight.
haha! Really!! You'd think separation of church and penmanship was in the Constitution, according to some of the hardened left commentary levelled against him....morons.
So, let's talk here. I seem to keep missing something. It is relative, in part, but not specifically from Pop's article. It's more from the benefit for this post's title. It is certainly not a knock against their needed, caring, worthwhile, uplifting work. But I see opportunity and a hollow corner in the need the Center represents. Let me post a scripture. Please don't kill me on this. Hermeneutics is not my strong point.
1 Corinthians 11:8-9,11-12 For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man..... In the Lord, however, woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God.Hopefully, one can see where I am going here.
I feel it remiss to overlook the men or outreach for fathers-to-be (whether they be
in absentia or
present and accounted for). I was heartened and emotionally moved by the stories told and embodied on stage that evening. But where were the fathers? Is the cause not represented by success in retaining the family core? It is, by all appearances, based on success of the single woman and her progeny. The heart of the walk through pregnancy counseling and continuing success through child rearing classes seems built on the surrogacy of the Center.
I'm just curious about where the organization fits the father into their model. or is it worth it to them?
update: This isn't a challenge to the organization. But is it healthier for the grant writing process to exclude outreach for men? It seems to me, society now categorizes men as a lost cause in all familial events. Women's rights in the matter of pregnancy have severed the relationship between men and women further. What a horrific loss. We now condone the loss of a father as a success. It's a sham that bricks the road to ruin. Men have the door slammed in their faces in abortion rights. The father has no say in fetus rights (as trumped by the mother's rights). The father has no say, nor a pittance of right to his new child. I will hold my tongue on child support and the heavy handed paring of the societal bond it purports to retain. Men are called "deadbeats". When is the last time you heard, "deadbeat mom"? The male is reduced to spectatorship or a wallowing beggar for time or laughable fief under the hand of whim. These obstacles are not to convey the idea of quitting to men. But would you say to the woman with child, "buck up!", "be strong", or "shoulder the burden"?
Where is the hope and help for men who need? Could it be too much for men to pray help? Do men not want the help?
For a supposed patriarchal society, we do a crummy job looking out for the boys. Men and women were created to be together. I hope our Christian and secular centers start recognizing this truth with tandem action for the family.