Or is it odd that oil is reaching new heights, as tax relief checks start arriving?
turning off conspiracy theorist, ..............now.
Friday, May 9, 2008
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Don't call me Cracker,...Cracker
That's it. I have had it. I've been looking for an open avenue to point out the absolute obvious.
This video just pointed me down the path. Enjoy obvious racist Michelle Obama talk up the greatness of BHO. Is it ok that I carry such disdain for this America hating, racist, whiny person?
Who cares. I do. because it's true. She's all that (to coin a phrase).
Blah, blah, blah, then bang! There it is at close to 1:23 in the video. "that's OBM and he happens to be a black man" You can catch a glimpse of a cutesy smile just as the cut is made to the ending clip. Happens to be a black man? He's black. He's black? What?
He's black.
What?!??!?
Oh, never mind.
Seriously, the guy is half white and was raised by white grandparents and went to Harvard Law School. That guy couldn't get any whiter, if he was me. Listen up, his skin may be darker toned, but I don't care. What happened to his white half? Did it disappear when he became a "community organizer"? Did it get washed away in the blood of salvation from Rev. Wright's blistering, Anti-American, racist messages on Sunday mornings? What? No answer? I didn't think so. If race and gender don't matter, then don't bring it up with a coy smile. "Oh tee hee, he's black, isn't it just so sweet how I slid that in?"..no.
It's ridiculous. If the color a citizen's skin doesn't matter, then why do we keep calling this guy black. Potential to be first black president (sorry, Bill Clinton)? Sorry, folks. He has the potential to be the USA's first mixed race president. I could go on and I probably will later.
He happens to be black? He happens to be discounting one half of who he is to sell himself.
He happens to be half white. We all happen to accepting of the clear embodiment of racism...
The media keeps feeding the lie. We all keep swallowing the old 3/5 rule as gospel. Are we finally, fully through the looking glass? Or are we just being made to eat Jim Crow?
This video just pointed me down the path. Enjoy obvious racist Michelle Obama talk up the greatness of BHO. Is it ok that I carry such disdain for this America hating, racist, whiny person?
Who cares. I do. because it's true. She's all that (to coin a phrase).
Blah, blah, blah, then bang! There it is at close to 1:23 in the video. "that's OBM and he happens to be a black man" You can catch a glimpse of a cutesy smile just as the cut is made to the ending clip. Happens to be a black man? He's black. He's black? What?
He's black.
What?!??!?
Oh, never mind.
Seriously, the guy is half white and was raised by white grandparents and went to Harvard Law School. That guy couldn't get any whiter, if he was me. Listen up, his skin may be darker toned, but I don't care. What happened to his white half? Did it disappear when he became a "community organizer"? Did it get washed away in the blood of salvation from Rev. Wright's blistering, Anti-American, racist messages on Sunday mornings? What? No answer? I didn't think so. If race and gender don't matter, then don't bring it up with a coy smile. "Oh tee hee, he's black, isn't it just so sweet how I slid that in?"..no.
It's ridiculous. If the color a citizen's skin doesn't matter, then why do we keep calling this guy black. Potential to be first black president (sorry, Bill Clinton)? Sorry, folks. He has the potential to be the USA's first mixed race president. I could go on and I probably will later.
He happens to be black? He happens to be discounting one half of who he is to sell himself.
He happens to be half white. We all happen to accepting of the clear embodiment of racism...
The media keeps feeding the lie. We all keep swallowing the old 3/5 rule as gospel. Are we finally, fully through the looking glass? Or are we just being made to eat Jim Crow?
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Do You Really Want More Democrat 'Leadership'?
I haven't written anything for a while. But this caught my eye.
"The House GOP leaders’ letter points out that the price of gasoline has spiked $1.18 since Democrats took over in January and stands at $3.51."
Really? Dang! Those 'Dims' are great at economic planning and implementation. It's like nothing happened....at all.
They are a stealthy lot, no?
Have you noticed how much groceries are going for these days? I can't wait for more biofuels.
Head nod to Matt Blunt, jr. for putting the cost of my favorite bread (Baker's Inn) out of budget....anyone else wonder why the food pantries in Missouri are seeing record requests for assistance?? hmmm...
Lastly, Newt is a traitor for getting all "kissy face" with Pelosi in that travesty of a "go green" commercial...in a word? lame.
Friday, April 11, 2008
The Mis-Leader's Garbled Voice of the Day
So, here it is. A dogmatic, intolerant liberal work against the introduction of Intelligent Design Theory in public schools. It is with characteristic self-righteousness, our liberal's 'voice of the day' expounds liberal stylings in writing.
Well, I am here to point out some of the guile and short assumptions of the piece. Let's get it!
"Ben Stein, the comedian advertising buffoon."~ Guess what buttercup? BenStein is much, much more than a buffoon. But the liberal writer expects no research. He banks on the reader taking the statement as gospel. Mr Stein has been involved in more facets of American life than can be reconciled here. Our writer minimizes greater thinking by name calling..a sure sign of high thinking.
"intelligent design," the belief that one God created the world and life, is absurd!"~Yep. There's no absurdity involved in using Joni Mitchell's lyrics to validate scientific debate of Evolution over Intelligent Design. Now, that's some stellar thinking! Somehow, pop icon lyricism overshadows years of debate still raging in the scientific community. The liberal mind is closed to thought outside the doctrine.
"everyone is entitled to their own belief ..., as long as they do not infringe on my beliefs" ~Oh no. Not infringement!! Oh dear sensitive reader, do not tread on these fine sensibilities. Do you get this? Contrary beliefs represent a challenge to personal rights. This, above all, is the hallmark of close-minded thinking.
"or try to defy the public school system's purpose of teaching students the truth"~I defy the public schools to teach anything other than humanist doctrine or correctly teach Math & Science, for that matter. Maybe it's time to shake up our state schools Science departments?
"He may be intelligent enough to follow the facts, or he may be so conflicted because of his strict religious family's beliefs."~Religion = bad. Facts based in "collective thought" = good. You see the family doesn't matter. It's confining and restrictive. Collectivism is freedom. Ask anyone who lived in Communist Poland. Diversification of teachings and free choice represent the the greatest threat to the liberal mindset.
"Our forefathers meant for us to have a separation of church and state"~Yes, yes. The great tenant (re: myth) of any good liberal argument against free religious discourse in the public forum. Frankly, I am surprised it took the writer this long to pull it out. At best, it's boring. So, I'll give you some great reading to counter this insipid, lock step argumentation. I'll even point out the banality of separation. The Constitutional implication isn't a difficult conclusion. It is meant to prevent using religion (ex: Church of England) as a preferential, state organization. The conclusion wasn't to prevent freedom from religion in the national conversation or life.
Well, I am here to point out some of the guile and short assumptions of the piece. Let's get it!
"Ben Stein, the comedian advertising buffoon."~ Guess what buttercup? BenStein is much, much more than a buffoon. But the liberal writer expects no research. He banks on the reader taking the statement as gospel. Mr Stein has been involved in more facets of American life than can be reconciled here. Our writer minimizes greater thinking by name calling..a sure sign of high thinking.
"intelligent design," the belief that one God created the world and life, is absurd!"~Yep. There's no absurdity involved in using Joni Mitchell's lyrics to validate scientific debate of Evolution over Intelligent Design. Now, that's some stellar thinking! Somehow, pop icon lyricism overshadows years of debate still raging in the scientific community. The liberal mind is closed to thought outside the doctrine.
"everyone is entitled to their own belief ..., as long as they do not infringe on my beliefs" ~Oh no. Not infringement!! Oh dear sensitive reader, do not tread on these fine sensibilities. Do you get this? Contrary beliefs represent a challenge to personal rights. This, above all, is the hallmark of close-minded thinking.
"or try to defy the public school system's purpose of teaching students the truth"~I defy the public schools to teach anything other than humanist doctrine or correctly teach Math & Science, for that matter. Maybe it's time to shake up our state schools Science departments?
"He may be intelligent enough to follow the facts, or he may be so conflicted because of his strict religious family's beliefs."~Religion = bad. Facts based in "collective thought" = good. You see the family doesn't matter. It's confining and restrictive. Collectivism is freedom. Ask anyone who lived in Communist Poland. Diversification of teachings and free choice represent the the greatest threat to the liberal mindset.
"Our forefathers meant for us to have a separation of church and state"~Yes, yes. The great tenant (re: myth) of any good liberal argument against free religious discourse in the public forum. Frankly, I am surprised it took the writer this long to pull it out. At best, it's boring. So, I'll give you some great reading to counter this insipid, lock step argumentation. I'll even point out the banality of separation. The Constitutional implication isn't a difficult conclusion. It is meant to prevent using religion (ex: Church of England) as a preferential, state organization. The conclusion wasn't to prevent freedom from religion in the national conversation or life.
"Yaaaay! At least one candidate for governor is an evolved human being."~Yaaay! Name calling is easy!!
"Rep. Wayne Cooper, Republican ... And what kind of people voted this joker a job at the state legislature? "~ I suppose a majority. Oh? That was a slight. I couldn't tell by the name calling....witty.
"I never cease to be surprised how little we all have evolved when the intelligence of man is involved!"~A rapacious statement that plumbs the depth of the depressive mindset. It places the core on display, but speaks a great truth, too. Faith in man vs. God will fail you.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Hillary, Hillary, How Does Your Clinton Supporter Go?
I really can't leave this alone for the moment. It isn't the salacious nature of the topic.
It's about Hill and her supporters. It's where her national health care will go and what it will pay for.
As noted earlier, Sir Elton hit the US populace for it's apparent misogynist leanings.
He also found time to castigate Ronald Reagan's response to AIDS in the 1980's.
Somehow, one of the greatest US Presidents in history is to blame for mass, international gross personal/social irresponsibilty. Ok, that's perfect. It shows the typicality of Hill/Bill's bandwagon. Please note the lifestyle Hill allows Sir Elton to place as a political agenda item. Is Sir Elton her moral proxy? He isn't mine. I hope you morailty isn't usurped by supporting Hillary.
(note: there is adult content herein: no nudity but factual, real medical accounting) ***not suitable for children***
here
here
morehere
Are you getting this? Wake up. This reveals a standardized buttress of her platform.
I harbor nothing ill toward homosexuals. We all deserve God's grace and forgiveness.
It's about Hill and her supporters. It's where her national health care will go and what it will pay for.
As noted earlier, Sir Elton hit the US populace for it's apparent misogynist leanings.
He also found time to castigate Ronald Reagan's response to AIDS in the 1980's.
Somehow, one of the greatest US Presidents in history is to blame for mass, international gross personal/social irresponsibilty. Ok, that's perfect. It shows the typicality of Hill/Bill's bandwagon. Please note the lifestyle Hill allows Sir Elton to place as a political agenda item. Is Sir Elton her moral proxy? He isn't mine. I hope you morailty isn't usurped by supporting Hillary.
(note: there is adult content herein: no nudity but factual, real medical accounting) ***not suitable for children***
here
here
morehere
Are you getting this? Wake up. This reveals a standardized buttress of her platform.
I harbor nothing ill toward homosexuals. We all deserve God's grace and forgiveness.
a "hey. who's that at the door?" UPDATE: Michelle Malkin cleans the window to Elton's love for Female politicians
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
